華碩這個所謂 1T 到底改了哪理 我沒辦法直接說明
但你超頻也玩那麼久了
應該知道 2T 跟 1T 的極限是有差別的
而單面跟雙面對 1T 的極限也是有明顯差距
你覺得從你測試的結果
這個真是有可能是 1T 嗎 ?
可以改變效能的地方太多
不能說找一個有效能差別的地方做了一個選項就佯稱這就是 Command Rate 的設定
然後讓大家覺得
哇 好神啊 1T 可以跑這麼高
這樣的做法我實在不能認同...
那我覺得這更應該說明嚕
老實說,也只有你夠份量可以看這個,
如果DFI真的是已經get in hand with x38,那您更應該了解x38是可以直接切換1t and 2t..
asus 只是把這道理直接搬到p35上頭,應該不致於讓您發這麼大火吧?;)
先看看再說嚕,您說是不是啊?;)
請大家先忍耐一下,先退一邊:D,以免被君子風掃到:D
*****************************************************************
Command rate 1T/2T on P5K3 Deluxe
Please check this window captured from a high frequency scope. It contained the signals clock(yellow), CS#(blue) & SCAS#(pink). You can check that the exact point of command cycle is pointed by green arrow. CS# was asserted as low voltage & it was triggered at the corresponding clock rising edge. The red arrow pointed the clock rising edge ahead 1T from the command cycle, & you can see SCAS# was asserted earlier 1T then CS# asserted at command cycle, that’s the way we call it “2T command”.
& then we set the command rate to “1T”, we captured this window for comparison.
You can see the low pulse of CS# signal was still the same with previous picture. But it’s obvious to see the assertion of SCAS# was at same time with CS# assertion & not earlier then the clock rising edge that red arrow pointed. So it’s a real 1T command to save one cycle time before command issued.
小弟當然知道您所稱之"超頻玩那麼久,知道那邊去改效能會差很多
但是,但是如果這真的是1t,那就不是只有佯稱能形容嚕,那就是要正名嚕;)
尚請吳大不吝指教;)