- 已加入
- 1/12/05
- 訊息
- 4,395
- 互動分數
- 0
- 點數
- 0
- 年齡
- 45
http://www.iamxtreme.com/cpu/fx60vst2600/cpu060427_04.htm
剛弄完 連照片都還沒照 就弄給大家看
看看到底是FX60屌 還是T2600 XD
We easily overclock Yonah to 2.6G with default 1.2v, 3G with 1.5v, and 3.315G with 1.65v. All of those overclocking speed are included in following tests. Some of the tests we also add in AMD FX60 3G benchmark.
SUPER PI 32M
LOWER IS BETTER
Somehow we are not sure why T2600 runs much faster than FX60 under same speed. We believe it is because the L2 sharing technology for T2600 gives advantage to calculate the PI decimal faster.
3DMark01
HIGHER IS BETTER
3Dmark01 is very depending on CPU graphical calculation power. It clears shows T2600 under same speed is strong than FX60.
3DMark03
HIGHER IS BETTER
3Dmark03 always very depends on CPU graphical power too. However, it also stresses CPU more than any other kind of FutureMark products. FX60 under 3.1G air we can not finished all bench. We can see the result is very similar to 01.
3DMark05
HIGHER IS BETTER
3Dmark05 is more depending on the video card but still relate to the processing speed of CPU. we see the result between FX60 and T2600 getting closer. Even FX60 at 3G out perform T2600. However, once we reach speed of 3.1G, we think the DDR2 at 792, near 800 4-3-2 timing gives more bandwidth, so T2600 at 3.1G out perform FX60 at 3.1G. Or maybe is because the chipset limition.
3DMark06
HIGHER IS BETTER
Same thing happens in 3Dmark06 also. We believe video card is at the maximum performance for now. At T2600 3.1G and 3.3G and FX60 at 3G, 3.1G, the score is about the same. 3.1G FX60 even slower than 3G FX60. That might because 3.1G FX60 is unstable and gave lower CPU score and plus maximum performance is cut out at 3G. Given for speed of CPU will not pull out any additional score from video card.
Sandra CPU Arithmetic Benchmark
HIGHER IS BETTER
Very interesting, the FPU and iSSE2 for FX60 is actually stronger than T2600. But meanwhile T2600 has better ALU score. Maybe this is why Super Pi 32M calculation is much faster than FX60.
Sandra CPU Multi-Media Benchmark
HIGHER IS BETTER
Well, from this we can tell that under multi-media bench, both CPU almost exactly the same.
Cinebench CPU Benchmark
HIGHER IS BETTER
More interesting thing, Cinebench score for both CPU are very very close to each other. It seem like OpenGL calculation for FX60 and T2600 are almost same!
Price
LOWER IS ALWAYS BETTER
But there is not a lot of motherboard for T2600, Aopen seems like the only one i975X motherboard on the market. Also for NF4 motherboard, there are many great and lower price motherboard and ram. The actually price different at the lowest cost can be almost same price. But, of course you will lost a lot of features as price cut!
剛弄完 連照片都還沒照 就弄給大家看
看看到底是FX60屌 還是T2600 XD
We easily overclock Yonah to 2.6G with default 1.2v, 3G with 1.5v, and 3.315G with 1.65v. All of those overclocking speed are included in following tests. Some of the tests we also add in AMD FX60 3G benchmark.
SUPER PI 32M
LOWER IS BETTER
Somehow we are not sure why T2600 runs much faster than FX60 under same speed. We believe it is because the L2 sharing technology for T2600 gives advantage to calculate the PI decimal faster.
3DMark01
HIGHER IS BETTER
3Dmark01 is very depending on CPU graphical calculation power. It clears shows T2600 under same speed is strong than FX60.
3DMark03
HIGHER IS BETTER
3Dmark03 always very depends on CPU graphical power too. However, it also stresses CPU more than any other kind of FutureMark products. FX60 under 3.1G air we can not finished all bench. We can see the result is very similar to 01.
3DMark05
HIGHER IS BETTER
3Dmark05 is more depending on the video card but still relate to the processing speed of CPU. we see the result between FX60 and T2600 getting closer. Even FX60 at 3G out perform T2600. However, once we reach speed of 3.1G, we think the DDR2 at 792, near 800 4-3-2 timing gives more bandwidth, so T2600 at 3.1G out perform FX60 at 3.1G. Or maybe is because the chipset limition.
3DMark06
HIGHER IS BETTER
Same thing happens in 3Dmark06 also. We believe video card is at the maximum performance for now. At T2600 3.1G and 3.3G and FX60 at 3G, 3.1G, the score is about the same. 3.1G FX60 even slower than 3G FX60. That might because 3.1G FX60 is unstable and gave lower CPU score and plus maximum performance is cut out at 3G. Given for speed of CPU will not pull out any additional score from video card.
Sandra CPU Arithmetic Benchmark
HIGHER IS BETTER
Very interesting, the FPU and iSSE2 for FX60 is actually stronger than T2600. But meanwhile T2600 has better ALU score. Maybe this is why Super Pi 32M calculation is much faster than FX60.
Sandra CPU Multi-Media Benchmark
HIGHER IS BETTER
Well, from this we can tell that under multi-media bench, both CPU almost exactly the same.
Cinebench CPU Benchmark
HIGHER IS BETTER
More interesting thing, Cinebench score for both CPU are very very close to each other. It seem like OpenGL calculation for FX60 and T2600 are almost same!
Price
LOWER IS ALWAYS BETTER
But there is not a lot of motherboard for T2600, Aopen seems like the only one i975X motherboard on the market. Also for NF4 motherboard, there are many great and lower price motherboard and ram. The actually price different at the lowest cost can be almost same price. But, of course you will lost a lot of features as price cut!
