AHCI 開啟的情況下,在Windows下就能夠直接抓到並自動安裝Windows AHCI的驅動程式,不過在 Intel 的平台上可以有更好的快速儲存技術(Intel RST),把Windows內建AHCI驅動程式換成Intel RST的驅動可以使效能再提昇一些。以下是實測對照的結果,供各位參考。
測試平台
CPU: Intel Core i7-4770K 市售版
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master V6GT
RAM: GSKILL DDR3 2800 4GBx2
MB: MSI Z87 MPOWER SP
VGA: AMD HD 5450
HDD: OCZ Vertex 3.20 240GB(OS)、OCZ Vector 150 240GB
PSU: Tt Toughpower DPS 850W 80+金牌
OS: Windows 7 64bit
關於OCZ Vector 150 240GB的開箱及Z77平台測試可參考:http://www.coolaler.com/content.php/2784
HD Tune Pro 讀取測試
Windows AHCI
平均讀取:481.9 MB/s
Intel RST AHCI
平均讀取:523.6 MB/s
Windows AHCI
平均寫入:472.0 MB/s
Intel RST AHCI
平均寫入:475.8 MB/s
Windows AHCI
檔案效能測試
Intel RST AHCI
檔案效能測試
ATTO Disk Benchmark
Windows AHCI
讀取:537 MB/s
寫入:515 MB/s
Intel RST AHCI
讀取:539 MB/s
寫入:514 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark x64 隨機讀寫測試
Windows AHCI
讀取:513.4 MB/s
寫入:490.3 MB/s
Intel RST AHCI
讀取:523.0 MB/s
寫入:495.3 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark x64 0Fill讀寫測試
Windows AHCI
讀取:502.6 MB/s
寫入:487.3 MB/s
Intel RST AHCI
讀取:516.1 MB/s
寫入:491.8 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark x64 1Fill讀寫測試
Windows AHCI
讀取:500.3 MB/s
寫入:487.6 MB/s
Intel RST AHCI
讀取:521.4 MB/s
寫入:491.4 MB/s
AS SSD Benchmark
Windows AHCI
讀取:509.87 MB/s
寫入:488.79 MB/s
Score:1101
Intel RST AHCI
讀取:510.91 MB/s
寫入:490.72 MB/s
Score:1174
Windows AHCI
4K-64Thrd 讀取:84887 IOPS
4K-64Thrd 寫入:82023 IOPS
Intel RST AHCI
4K-64Thrd 讀取:87842 IOPS
4K-64Thrd 寫入:83068 IOPS
Windows AHCI
Copy Benchmark
Intel RST AHCI
Copy Benchmark
Windows AHCI
Compression-Benchmark
Intel RST AHCI
Compression-Benchmark
Avil's Storage Utilities
Windows AHCI
讀取:506.93 MB/s
寫入:482.56 MB/s
4K QD16 讀取:60267.43 IOPS
4K QD16 寫入:88268.52 IOPS
Intel RST AHCI
讀取:516.91 MB/s
寫入:497.33 MB/s
4K QD16 讀取:61281.25 IOPS
4K QD16 寫入:88388.58 IOPS
小結
雖然整體來看差異並不會太大,不過幾乎所有測試項目都是Intel RST AHCI的效率比較高,所以Intel平台的玩家們,別忘了裝上Intel RST的驅動程式。
關於Intel RST:http://www.intel.com/p/zh_TW/support/highlights/sftwr-prod/imsm
測試平台
CPU: Intel Core i7-4770K 市售版
CPU Cooler: Cooler Master V6GT
RAM: GSKILL DDR3 2800 4GBx2
MB: MSI Z87 MPOWER SP
VGA: AMD HD 5450
HDD: OCZ Vertex 3.20 240GB(OS)、OCZ Vector 150 240GB
PSU: Tt Toughpower DPS 850W 80+金牌
OS: Windows 7 64bit
關於OCZ Vector 150 240GB的開箱及Z77平台測試可參考:http://www.coolaler.com/content.php/2784
HD Tune Pro 讀取測試
Windows AHCI
平均讀取:481.9 MB/s
Intel RST AHCI
平均讀取:523.6 MB/s
Windows AHCI
平均寫入:472.0 MB/s
Intel RST AHCI
平均寫入:475.8 MB/s
Windows AHCI
檔案效能測試
Intel RST AHCI
檔案效能測試
ATTO Disk Benchmark
Windows AHCI
讀取:537 MB/s
寫入:515 MB/s
Intel RST AHCI
讀取:539 MB/s
寫入:514 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark x64 隨機讀寫測試
Windows AHCI
讀取:513.4 MB/s
寫入:490.3 MB/s
Intel RST AHCI
讀取:523.0 MB/s
寫入:495.3 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark x64 0Fill讀寫測試
Windows AHCI
讀取:502.6 MB/s
寫入:487.3 MB/s
Intel RST AHCI
讀取:516.1 MB/s
寫入:491.8 MB/s
CrystalDiskMark x64 1Fill讀寫測試
Windows AHCI
讀取:500.3 MB/s
寫入:487.6 MB/s
Intel RST AHCI
讀取:521.4 MB/s
寫入:491.4 MB/s
AS SSD Benchmark
Windows AHCI
讀取:509.87 MB/s
寫入:488.79 MB/s
Score:1101
Intel RST AHCI
讀取:510.91 MB/s
寫入:490.72 MB/s
Score:1174
Windows AHCI
4K-64Thrd 讀取:84887 IOPS
4K-64Thrd 寫入:82023 IOPS
Intel RST AHCI
4K-64Thrd 讀取:87842 IOPS
4K-64Thrd 寫入:83068 IOPS
Windows AHCI
Copy Benchmark
Intel RST AHCI
Copy Benchmark
Windows AHCI
Compression-Benchmark
Intel RST AHCI
Compression-Benchmark
Avil's Storage Utilities
Windows AHCI
讀取:506.93 MB/s
寫入:482.56 MB/s
4K QD16 讀取:60267.43 IOPS
4K QD16 寫入:88268.52 IOPS
Intel RST AHCI
讀取:516.91 MB/s
寫入:497.33 MB/s
4K QD16 讀取:61281.25 IOPS
4K QD16 寫入:88388.58 IOPS
小結
雖然整體來看差異並不會太大,不過幾乎所有測試項目都是Intel RST AHCI的效率比較高,所以Intel平台的玩家們,別忘了裝上Intel RST的驅動程式。
關於Intel RST:http://www.intel.com/p/zh_TW/support/highlights/sftwr-prod/imsm