- 已加入
- 7/27/11
- 訊息
- 53
- 互動分數
- 0
- 點數
- 0
在A4-3400的測試分享之後,接著就來看看他的耐操性如何吧!!
測試平台:
處理器:AMD A4-3400雙核心處理器
主機板:ASRock A55M-HVS
記憶體:ADATA 4G DDRIII 1333
顯示卡:內建顯示核心HD 6410D
作業系統:Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
經過多重測試驗證,倍頻維持26X,外頻調整至120MHz,此時處理器的速度來到3120MHz,記憶體時脈則調整至1600MHz,上述設定下,完成了這次的各項測試
此外,為了方便比較超頻後各性能成長情形,下面的測試結果將一併列出預設時脈下的成績
效能測試:
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
3DMark06 Score:4171
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
3DMark06 Score:5068
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
3DMark Vantage:1950
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
3DMark Vantage:2639
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
3DMark11 Score:E916
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
3DMark11 Score:E1100
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
3DMark11 Score:P564
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
3DMark11 Score:P670
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
3DMark11 Score:X167
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
3DMark11 Score:X200
列表如下:
遊戲測試:
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
Biohazard惡靈古堡5,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX9的成績為24.5
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
Biohazard惡靈古堡5,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX9的成績為35.0
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
Biohazard惡靈古堡5,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX10的成績為23.6
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
Biohazard惡靈古堡5,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX10的成績為33.1
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
Devil May Cry 4,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX9的成績為38.9
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
Devil May Cry 4,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX9的成績為48.4
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
Devil May Cry 4,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX10的成績為37.9
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
Devil May Cry 4,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX10的成績為45.7
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
Lost Planet 2,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX9的成績為14.3
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
Lost Planet 2,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX9的成績為16.1
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
Lost Planet 2,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX11的成績為6.2
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
Lost Planet 2,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX11的成績為8.2
列表如下:
基礎效能測試:
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
CineBench:1.49 pts
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
CineBench:1.77 pts
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
Fritz Chess Benchmark:3,140千步
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
Fritz Chess Benchmark:3,769千步
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
WinRAR:992 KB/S
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
WinRAR:1,118 KB/S
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
7-Zip:壓縮評等4,157 MIPS,解壓縮則是4,927 MIPS
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
7-Zip:壓縮評等5,112 MIPS,解壓縮則是6,186 MIPS
列成圖表如下:
不專業評論:
1. 整體數據來看,在超頻的加持下,測試效能幾乎都成長了20%,3DMark Vantage更成長了35%,從3DMark06的分數來看,效能已經逼近三核心CPU A6-3500的等級了
2. 此外,由於APU的內顯效能會隨著外頻提升而成長,在超外頻的同時,顯示效能也跟著飆高,遊戲測試中惡靈古堡的成長最驚人,竟然可以提高40%
3. 一般使用者最常用到的基礎效能也有大約12-20%的成長
4. 目前A6-3500的價錢大約是2700,A4-3400大約是2200,經過超頻調教後,效能完全跳了一個層級,CP值也跟著提高不少
測試平台:
處理器:AMD A4-3400雙核心處理器
主機板:ASRock A55M-HVS
記憶體:ADATA 4G DDRIII 1333
顯示卡:內建顯示核心HD 6410D
作業系統:Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
經過多重測試驗證,倍頻維持26X,外頻調整至120MHz,此時處理器的速度來到3120MHz,記憶體時脈則調整至1600MHz,上述設定下,完成了這次的各項測試
此外,為了方便比較超頻後各性能成長情形,下面的測試結果將一併列出預設時脈下的成績
效能測試:
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
3DMark06 Score:4171
![6196619909_af8befd56f_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6174/6196619909_af8befd56f_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
3DMark06 Score:5068
![6196620023_9098f886cf_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6156/6196620023_9098f886cf_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
3DMark Vantage:1950
![6196620097_0f5f235a3f_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6159/6196620097_0f5f235a3f_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
3DMark Vantage:2639
![6196620169_8fba7e8b14_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6153/6196620169_8fba7e8b14_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
3DMark11 Score:E916
![6197132704_055984ed4e_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6027/6197132704_055984ed4e_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
3DMark11 Score:E1100
![6196620337_889d58b733_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6009/6196620337_889d58b733_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
3DMark11 Score:P564
![6196620419_f305522e5c_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6009/6196620419_f305522e5c_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
3DMark11 Score:P670
![6196620491_bafde78be4_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6161/6196620491_bafde78be4_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
3DMark11 Score:X167
![6197133092_627b9813db_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6011/6197133092_627b9813db_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
3DMark11 Score:X200
![6197133196_c6dffa9e39_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6152/6197133196_c6dffa9e39_b.jpg)
列表如下:
![6197133286_d75e9e2678_z.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6025/6197133286_d75e9e2678_z.jpg)
![6197133368_4e5d0ae672.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6129/6197133368_4e5d0ae672.jpg)
遊戲測試:
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
Biohazard惡靈古堡5,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX9的成績為24.5
![6196620827_1647c73966_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6175/6196620827_1647c73966_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
Biohazard惡靈古堡5,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX9的成績為35.0
![6197133444_74f813d980_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6179/6197133444_74f813d980_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
Biohazard惡靈古堡5,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX10的成績為23.6
![6197133520_8f22b3c885_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6177/6197133520_8f22b3c885_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
Biohazard惡靈古堡5,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX10的成績為33.1
![6196621061_1e65964ac7_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6021/6196621061_1e65964ac7_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
Devil May Cry 4,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX9的成績為38.9
![6197133682_cb92aa5278_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6022/6197133682_cb92aa5278_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
Devil May Cry 4,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX9的成績為48.4
![6197133758_2822ea34ce_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6137/6197133758_2822ea34ce_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
Devil May Cry 4,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX10的成績為37.9
![6197133828_1d51148832_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6154/6197133828_1d51148832_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
Devil May Cry 4,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX10的成績為45.7
![6196621417_dac034a3c0_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6013/6196621417_dac034a3c0_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
Lost Planet 2,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX9的成績為14.3
![6196621493_2b54f9a3d4_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6179/6196621493_2b54f9a3d4_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
Lost Planet 2,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX9的成績為16.1
![6197134080_7281488131_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6175/6197134080_7281488131_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
Lost Planet 2,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX11的成績為6.2
![6197134156_23ff395eeb_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6146/6197134156_23ff395eeb_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
Lost Planet 2,1680 X 1050,8倍AA下DirectX11的成績為8.2
![6196621679_7e13011d0c_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6170/6196621679_7e13011d0c_b.jpg)
列表如下:
![6197134192_cc8ee147a5_z.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6127/6197134192_cc8ee147a5_z.jpg)
![6197134208_aa56f46580.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6180/6197134208_aa56f46580.jpg)
基礎效能測試:
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
CineBench:1.49 pts
![6196621747_0fe1c3c1fe_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6178/6196621747_0fe1c3c1fe_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
CineBench:1.77 pts
![6197134282_9d3b9fa8b3_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6173/6197134282_9d3b9fa8b3_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
Fritz Chess Benchmark:3,140千步
![6197134326_da6cab0e95.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6153/6197134326_da6cab0e95.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
Fritz Chess Benchmark:3,769千步
![6197163582_6496bcef87.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6133/6197163582_6496bcef87.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
WinRAR:992 KB/S
![6196621875_8503d63011_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6129/6196621875_8503d63011_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
WinRAR:1,118 KB/S
![6196621935_c8e518c2f5_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6173/6196621935_c8e518c2f5_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (2.6 GHz , 100 X 26)
7-Zip:壓縮評等4,157 MIPS,解壓縮則是4,927 MIPS
![6197134438_c60a3a00de_b.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6141/6197134438_c60a3a00de_b.jpg)
AMD A4-3400 (3.1 GHz , 120 X 26)
7-Zip:壓縮評等5,112 MIPS,解壓縮則是6,186 MIPS
![6196622003_fd826d18e6_z.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6165/6196622003_fd826d18e6_z.jpg)
列成圖表如下:
![6196622015_af5289c6cb_z.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6027/6196622015_af5289c6cb_z.jpg)
![6196622039_6861bb19de.jpg](http://farm7.static.flickr.com/6159/6196622039_6861bb19de.jpg)
不專業評論:
1. 整體數據來看,在超頻的加持下,測試效能幾乎都成長了20%,3DMark Vantage更成長了35%,從3DMark06的分數來看,效能已經逼近三核心CPU A6-3500的等級了
2. 此外,由於APU的內顯效能會隨著外頻提升而成長,在超外頻的同時,顯示效能也跟著飆高,遊戲測試中惡靈古堡的成長最驚人,竟然可以提高40%
3. 一般使用者最常用到的基礎效能也有大約12-20%的成長
4. 目前A6-3500的價錢大約是2700,A4-3400大約是2200,經過超頻調教後,效能完全跳了一個層級,CP值也跟著提高不少