[Compare] 45nm(Wolfdale-Yorkfield) vs 65nm(Conroe-Kentsfield)

[mike6794]

所以還是不太準
慢慢的就會浮現真相了
感謝大大測試

 

[4767683]

雙核贏四核, 強

 

[tqmgp]

E6550果然還是不錯阿
也期待45nm的U有更佳的效能

 

[狂少]

For JC兄

well, those Comparo for me really give me lots of difference between these two micron-process. Even though not a big deal, intel might be aware of this difference
well, keep in mind, the result is ONLY in early engineering sample AFAIK, who knows next steps intel would gonna do? right my bro;)
Thanks for contribute this in details;)

 

[nybaao]

雙核贏四核, 強

可是時脈又不一樣

而且四核本來就比較難超....

 

[JCornell]

For JC兄

well, those Comparo for me really give me lots of difference between these two micron-process. Even though not a big deal, intel might be aware of this difference
well, keep in mind, the result is ONLY in early engineering sample AFAIK, who knows next steps intel would gonna do? right my bro
Thanks for contribute this in details

Yeah, wait for the next revision or higher multiplier series like others said, maybe it'll be more oc-able. ;em03;

 

[JCornell]

可是時脈又不一樣

他可能還沒睡飽吧 :PPP:

 

[4767683]

他可能還沒睡飽吧 :PPP:

拍謝啦, 被颱風吹昏頭, 小弟想表達的是, 同樣的處理器架構, 對於不支援多核心的程式而言, 時脈較核心數影響來得大

 

[mosfet32]

;em28; 我要桌布

 

[sco005taiwan]

謝謝JC大大.好測試.您的桌布上的MM也正到不行了.