對岸 Bilibili 影片平台上最近有網友 "二斤啦啦啦啦" 曝光 Core i9-11900K(8C16T)與 Core i9-10900K(10C20T)的效能比較。據稱這顆 Core i9-11900K 雖仍是樣品,但是比較接近市售的版本。
該測試使用了 ASUS ROG STRIX RTX 3090 顯卡,主板 Z490,記憶體時脈 3600 MHz(CL16)。兩種處理器均已超頻至5.2 GHz。
CPU-Z 資訊,右側為 11900K,有多的指令集,但核心相比 10900K 少兩顆。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e05a/1e05a2febfa5141fd01aca51f8dbbc537cee5286" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_1.jpg"
CPU-Z 跑分,同5.2GHz時脈下 Core i9-11900K 單核心效能為693.4,10900K為622.8,提升了11.3%,至於多核心就不用看了XD,少了兩顆還是有差。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43eee/43eee339782501f4c56820f82c48ff5187f5bc54" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_2.jpg"
AIDA64 和 GPU-Z,主要還是在於第11代的 Core i9-11900K 支援 PCIe 4.0。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a736c/a736c0762dd234cae91f68215dbcf09edfff72d9" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_3.jpg"
CINEBENCH R15,單核心的部分 11900K 高出 10900K 約12.1%。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7424/b74249d3278665526491c83d3803882c5c477e59" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_4.jpg"
CINEBENCH R20,單核心的部分 11900K 高出 10900K 約15.7%。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f783/8f7833dfdcb35b81eb3e3f62d73a181a8e3cdb47" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_5.jpg"
CINEBENCH R23,單核心的部分 11900K 高出 10900K 約14%。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e43e6/e43e617e5c07685f4ca7fbf1322a1f0c30b89b54" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_6.jpg"
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c76c2/c76c274dbc1f9981c7b6dc5d585f99d9524d0150" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_7.jpg"
3DMark Fire Strike
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d5fa/0d5fad7398a23d5725ef660421e36827b98d34f8" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_8.jpg"
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c16fd/c16fdb66de1c01a8d4a8d8e2b6839746b71dd01c" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_9.jpg"
3DMark Port Royal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94fe7/94fe77589fdcecbc9bd1b27cd8f53bc1e4a0a84a" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_10.jpg"
遊戲效能
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0d3c/b0d3cf5883c4e3b98b114c706c8e5de52d3f6448" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_11.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ae1c/6ae1c15f5043d2282723b3ed245403db99e0368c" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_12.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36167/3616742e2e5f8d55cf36d67bc549e1aec455401a" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_13.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/829fa/829fae2dcfaae607389e3cbc0535f1d1b8f58c1e" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_14.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80df6/80df6af32388d6245a6bc99041a072c46be8aa42" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_15.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33387/333873b7fc82362a7bb94242bb39d08223d00788" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_16.jpg"
遊戲的部分看來並不是全贏,雖然說差兩顆,但 Core i9-11900K 8核心16執行緒對應多數遊戲來說應該是仍有餘,這也並不符合 Intel 所標榜最強遊戲處理器,當然這是工程樣品,並不代表最終市售產品。
來源
該測試使用了 ASUS ROG STRIX RTX 3090 顯卡,主板 Z490,記憶體時脈 3600 MHz(CL16)。兩種處理器均已超頻至5.2 GHz。
CPU-Z 資訊,右側為 11900K,有多的指令集,但核心相比 10900K 少兩顆。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e05a/1e05a2febfa5141fd01aca51f8dbbc537cee5286" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_1.jpg"
CPU-Z 跑分,同5.2GHz時脈下 Core i9-11900K 單核心效能為693.4,10900K為622.8,提升了11.3%,至於多核心就不用看了XD,少了兩顆還是有差。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43eee/43eee339782501f4c56820f82c48ff5187f5bc54" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_2.jpg"
AIDA64 和 GPU-Z,主要還是在於第11代的 Core i9-11900K 支援 PCIe 4.0。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a736c/a736c0762dd234cae91f68215dbcf09edfff72d9" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_3.jpg"
CINEBENCH R15,單核心的部分 11900K 高出 10900K 約12.1%。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7424/b74249d3278665526491c83d3803882c5c477e59" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_4.jpg"
CINEBENCH R20,單核心的部分 11900K 高出 10900K 約15.7%。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f783/8f7833dfdcb35b81eb3e3f62d73a181a8e3cdb47" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_5.jpg"
CINEBENCH R23,單核心的部分 11900K 高出 10900K 約14%。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e43e6/e43e617e5c07685f4ca7fbf1322a1f0c30b89b54" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_6.jpg"
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c76c2/c76c274dbc1f9981c7b6dc5d585f99d9524d0150" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_7.jpg"
3DMark Fire Strike
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d5fa/0d5fad7398a23d5725ef660421e36827b98d34f8" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_8.jpg"
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c16fd/c16fdb66de1c01a8d4a8d8e2b6839746b71dd01c" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_9.jpg"
3DMark Port Royal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/94fe7/94fe77589fdcecbc9bd1b27cd8f53bc1e4a0a84a" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_10.jpg"
遊戲效能
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0d3c/b0d3cf5883c4e3b98b114c706c8e5de52d3f6448" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_11.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ae1c/6ae1c15f5043d2282723b3ed245403db99e0368c" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_12.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36167/3616742e2e5f8d55cf36d67bc549e1aec455401a" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_13.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/829fa/829fae2dcfaae607389e3cbc0535f1d1b8f58c1e" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_14.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80df6/80df6af32388d6245a6bc99041a072c46be8aa42" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_15.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33387/333873b7fc82362a7bb94242bb39d08223d00788" alt="i9-11900K-vs_10900k_16.jpg"
遊戲的部分看來並不是全贏,雖然說差兩顆,但 Core i9-11900K 8核心16執行緒對應多數遊戲來說應該是仍有餘,這也並不符合 Intel 所標榜最強遊戲處理器,當然這是工程樣品,並不代表最終市售產品。
來源