AMD FX Vishera (all) reviews!

[FlanK3r]

Vishera looks in practice much better than Zambezi, now is better AMD time back again (from Phenoms II times)

Linux:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=amd_fx8350_vishera&num=1

Windows:
http://www.cowcotland.com/articles/1199/test-processeur-amd-fx-8350.html 5 GHz OC (stable for few benchmarks?)
http://pctuning.tyden.cz/hardware/procesory-pameti/25399-amd-piledriver-fx-procesor-fx-8350-v-testu 4.8 GHz OC
http://extrahardware.cnews.cz/recen...ati-osm-jader-piledriveru-na-4-ghz-amd-do-hry only boot to windows at 5 GHz
http://www.legitreviews.com/article/2055/1/ better SPC about 20W than fx-8150, OC 4916 MHz
http://www.computerbase.de/artikel/prozessoren/2012/test-amd-fx-8350-vishera/ +7% performance gain clock to clock in gaming at 1920x1080 and 8% in aplications, OC 5017 MHz
http://www.playwares.com/xe/cpu_mobo/25148406 10x FX-8350 in test OC, power consumption, temperatures.
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/FX-8350_Piledriver_Review/ 8-pin load -35W against FX-8150! Full load -36W, not bad! OC 5017 MHz
-

-

http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=962&Itemid=63 +7.86% IPC in Cinebench single thread, OC 5017 MHz for benchmarks
http://www.eteknix.com/reviews/processors/amd-fx-8350-am3-piledriver-processor-review/ OC 5118 MHz! after oc more less power than FX-8150.
-

http://www.hardcoreware.net/amd-piledriver-fx-review-vishera-8350/ interesting review, gaming graphs, FX-8320 is better than FX-8150, FX-6300 in test, OC 4600 MHz (but shi*y board)
http://www.hardwareheaven.com/reviews/1598/pg1/amd-fx-8350-processor-review-introduction.html max OC 5.2 GHz (without test stability)
http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/cpu/46985-amd-fx-8350-piledriver-cpu/ OC 4615 MHz
http://www.hitechlegion.com/reviews/processors/31312-amd-fx8350 oC 5.1 GHz, but mobo+CPU throttling (see Cinebench score, it could be about 8.6, not 8.2...)
http://www.planet3dnow.de/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=408737 some clock to clock benchmarks, some testing in Windows8, OC 4515 MHz with default voltage
-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

http://hothardware.com/Reviews/AMD-FX-8350-Vishera-8Core-CPU-Review/ OC 4.7 GHz with 1.42V
http://www.techspot.com/review/586-amd-fx-8350-fx-6300/
http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/FX-8350-vs-Core-i5-3470-CPU-Review/1657 OC 4792 MHz with 1.4V (CPU VDDA 2.8V)
http://vr-zone.com/articles/amd-fx-...--4.8ghz--cpu-performance-compared/17484.html (too basic review)
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-8350-vishera-review,3328.html max OC 5125 MHz, tested with 4800 MHz, clock for clock tetsing at 4 GHz
-

important info about max temp before throtling, test in photoshop CS6, 3Ds2012, Solidworks, visual studio
-

-

-

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6396/the-vishera-review-amd-fx8350-fx8320-fx6300-and-fx4300-tested FX-8350, 8320, 6300 and FX-4300 review, windows8 testing, simulation next gen AMD vs next Intel CPUs, 4.8GHz
-

-

http://techreport.com/review/23750/amd-fx-8350-processor-reviewed OC 4.5GHz/4.8GHz turbo
-

-

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru...-fx-8350-cpu-review-amds-vishera-arrives.html comparison clock to clock, 3D11 performance win!, 1280x1024 and 1920x1080 gaming graphs, FH performance, OC 4916 MHz
-

-

-

-

-

-

http://www.technic3d.com/review/cpu-s/1466-amd-fx-8350-vishera/1.htm#start clock to clock 2cu/4c 4GHz/4.2GHz turbo Zambezi, Trinity and Piledriver in software and games, OC 5GHz (example Cinebench r11.5=8.61, r10=30 000)
http://www.overclockersclub.com/reviews/amd_fx8350/2.htm, OC 5200 MHz! 9 points in R11.5 after OC.Gold award.
http://www.bitsandchips.it/9-hardwa...cora-8-core-per-le-cpu-fx-series-2012-vishera OC 4515 MHz, unstable up to 5100 MHz
-

http://www.bjorn3d.com/2012/10/amd-fx-8350/#.UIeW8ob6nAE 4415MHz OC with 1.4V
-

http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_fx_8350_processor_review,1.html OC 4716 MHz,
-

http://uk.hardware.info/reviews/3314/amd-fx-8350--8320--6300-vishera-review-finally-good-enough nice gaming comparison low resolution and high resolution, -16W in idle and -35W in practice load againts Fx-8150, OC 4662 MHz 1.5V
http://www.overclockers.com/amd-fx-8350-piledriver-cpu-review?utm_source=pr 4.9 GHz stable, LN2 part of overclocking 6800 MHz PiFast, 7080 superpi 1M, 7300Hz validation
http://www.pureoverclock.com/Review...shera-fx-8350-asus-crosshair-v-formula-z-rog/ FX+Asus Crosshair Formula-Z review, 5018 MHz OC
http://extrahardware.cnews.cz/testy/piledriver-vs-bulldozer-takt-na-takt-4-ghz clock to clock comparison
http://www.rage3d.com/reviews/cpu/amd_vishera_fx8350_launch_review/ OC 4716MHz
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/880-1/amd-fx-8350-retour-amd.html 4500 MHz OC with 1.4V, clock to clock comparison at 4GHz, hardwarefr make only practice test-rendering, visual studio, miniGW, practice encoding, compressing in practice !!
-

-

-

-

-

-

average aplications performance (higher is better)
-

average games performance (higher is better)
-

 

[ack001]

Thank you for sharing detailed test analysis of the text have your share CBB website will be better

 

[krad]

seems Vishera is pretty good for CG's work, and price also :PPP:

 

[FEMC]

You can also refer to
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/amd-fx-8350.html
This review showed the performance difference between FX-8150 and FX-8350 @ 4.0GHz

I think Vishera may get less advantage in some applications when the clock is lower...

 

[FlanK3r]

but at xbitlabs is not much benchmarks clock to clock, better is www.hardwarecanucks.com or at Planet3d http://www.planet3dnow.de/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=408737 or http://uk.hardware.info/reviews/3314/amd-fx-8350--8320--6300-vishera-review-finally-good-enough and here 4Ghz vs 4GHz http://www.hardware.fr/articles/880-1/amd-fx-8350-retour-amd.html

definetelly is Vishera better upgrade :)