之前的Barton將軍用的是SLK-900A(因為懶得拆主機板)....
等了SI-97好一陣子....總算鋪貨了....敗了一顆後...上機test...
師兄弟照片....
測試環境:
CPU: Barton 2500+ OC 2.3 Ghz (166 x 14)
MB: Asus A7V8X
Heat sink:
1. SLK-900A + CQ-5+ 三葉低頻扇 (8 x 8 cm, 50 CFM, 21 dBA)
2. SI-97 + Thermaltake silent cat (9 x 9 cm, 53 CFM, 21 dBA)
關側版, 風扇: 前: 12 cm x 1, 後: 8 cm x 2
1. SLK-900A + CQ-5+ 三葉低頻扇: 待機
2. SLK-900A + CQ-5+ 三葉低頻扇: 全速
3. SI-97 + Thermaltake silent cat: 待機
4. SI-97 + Thermaltake silent cat: 全速
結論:
晚出來的師弟還是厲害...同樣風量下 (50 V.S. 52 CFM)...
待機跟全速溫度硬是比師兄都各低兩度....(待: 52 --> 50, 全: 59 --> 57)
SLK-900已經比CQ5+要低上10度左右....
沒想到SI-97還要再降兩度...而且本體很輕....幾乎像玩具一樣....
看起來老將軍不怕在晚年中暑昏倒囉.... :lol:
等了SI-97好一陣子....總算鋪貨了....敗了一顆後...上機test...
師兄弟照片....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f12e7/f12e7db887a2f9a8adbcc57f4ff232339dd4eb5c" alt="IMG_1242.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f69b9/f69b9970a3cc55a18bb16168282a653ee740efff" alt="IMG_1245.jpg"
測試環境:
CPU: Barton 2500+ OC 2.3 Ghz (166 x 14)
MB: Asus A7V8X
Heat sink:
1. SLK-900A + CQ-5+ 三葉低頻扇 (8 x 8 cm, 50 CFM, 21 dBA)
2. SI-97 + Thermaltake silent cat (9 x 9 cm, 53 CFM, 21 dBA)
關側版, 風扇: 前: 12 cm x 1, 後: 8 cm x 2
1. SLK-900A + CQ-5+ 三葉低頻扇: 待機
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ca26/5ca2692c71fdcd63386080430d95ee8ddbabaf7c" alt="SLK900A.jpg"
2. SLK-900A + CQ-5+ 三葉低頻扇: 全速
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0f4ca/0f4cae0f83aec744fecf36d8c1cdab156e7329ae" alt="SLK900A.jpg"
3. SI-97 + Thermaltake silent cat: 待機
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ff51/1ff510729f077062b43c81f546dd929fd764b189" alt="SI97.jpg"
4. SI-97 + Thermaltake silent cat: 全速
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c1dd/7c1dd6107885e2222321b40f4edf5ad2aa1deb5b" alt="SI97.jpg"
結論:
晚出來的師弟還是厲害...同樣風量下 (50 V.S. 52 CFM)...
待機跟全速溫度硬是比師兄都各低兩度....(待: 52 --> 50, 全: 59 --> 57)
SLK-900已經比CQ5+要低上10度左右....
沒想到SI-97還要再降兩度...而且本體很輕....幾乎像玩具一樣....
看起來老將軍不怕在晚年中暑昏倒囉.... :lol: